Aegus

reports · graded insights

Every insight — graded, cited, defended.

Most AI reports are black boxes: bullet points without a defense. Aegus Reports runs every insight through the Institute — multi-source weighting, per-claim confidence, citation coverage, and dissent when sources disagree. You see the reasoning, not just the conclusion.

What gets graded in a report.

factor 01

Source density + agreement

How many independent sources support the claim, and how tightly they agree. Low agreement does not kill the claim — it gets flagged as contested terrain.

factor 02

Per-claim confidence

Every claim carries a 0–100% confidence score based on source quality, recency, and internal reasoning. Low-confidence claims are surfaced, not buried.

factor 03

Citation coverage

The fraction of claims in the final report that carry an explicit source citation. Uncited claims are auto-flagged for revision.

factor 04

Insight breadth

Narrow reports with 2 insights score lower than broad reports with 8. Breadth factors in against depth so we do not ship thin decks.

factor 05

Contrarian signals

If the corpus contains evidence that directly contradicts the majority view, it is surfaced as dissent — not hidden. You get the fight, not just the winner.

output

Composite grade A / B / C

Composite score rolls up to a single grade so you know at a glance whether the deck is ready to send or needs another source pass.

institute · live verdicts

Three sample reports, graded.

Same Institute framework that grades PATH trading signals. Every report routes through it before delivery. Expand the evidence chain on any card to see the per-source reasoning.

Q1 2026 Crypto Memecoin Narrative ReviewA · 92
confidence 92%

Report draws on 12 sources with 82% average confidence; sources align — 95% of claims carry citations.

well sourcedhigh confidencefully cited
Evidence chain (3)
SourceClaimWeight
  • corpus12 distinct sources25.0
  • confidence scoreravg per-claim confidence 0.8220.5
  • citation audit95% of claims cited19.0
Dissent
  • contrarian1 contrarian signal(s) flagged
SMB Automation Stack Opportunity MapB · 67
confidence 75%

Report draws on 6 sources with 65% average confidence; sources align — 75% of claims carry citations.

well sourced
Evidence chain (3)
SourceClaimWeight
  • corpus6 distinct sources15.0
  • confidence scoreravg per-claim confidence 0.6516.3
  • citation audit75% of claims cited15.0
Early Draft — Contested Market SizingC · 45
confidence 65%

Report draws on 4 sources with 55% average confidence; sources diverge — 50% of claims carry citations.

contested terrain
Evidence chain (3)
SourceClaimWeight
  • corpus4 distinct sources10.0
  • confidence scoreravg per-claim confidence 0.5513.8
  • citation audit50% of claims cited10.0
Dissent
  • source agreementsources contradict — surface dissent in report
  • contrarian2 contrarian signal(s) flagged

Cadence + scope.

weekly

Monday morning operating report

Ships before 9 AM local every Monday. 6–9 insights, each graded. Connects Stripe, Shopify, QuickBooks, GA4, HubSpot — whatever you use. Branded PDF in your inbox.

quarterly

Strategy + narrative review

Deeper synthesis across the quarter, including competitor moves, narrative shifts, and recommended experiments. Dissent section always included.

Paired with the rest of the stack.

Reports reads from the same Institute that grades trades, calls, and content. The pattern library is shared — what the voice agent learns from client calls informs which insights the report surfaces next week. See the full diagram.

Get your first report.

Tell us what your business actually needs visibility into. We scope the source stack (Stripe, Shopify, HubSpot, GA4, etc.), build the first weekly report, and grade every insight against the same Institute framework the rest of the stack uses.